TL;DR
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A personal essay published by Tiny Buddha describes an author’s hesitation to tell an old friend about a chronic health issue. The account distinguishes privacy and boundaries from excuses that can disguise avoidance, while leaving open whether the author will share the information.
Tiny Buddha has published a first-person essay about an author who hesitated to tell an old friend about a chronic health issue, using the exchange to examine how concern for another person can sometimes conceal a wish to avoid vulnerability. The author also argues that privacy is a valid choice: the distinction is whether someone consciously chooses not to share or simply lets the moment pass without deciding.
The essay recounts a late-night message exchange with a former graduate-school friend. After the two had caught up on family, work and everyday life, the author considered telling her about a health problem and the previous year. The author describes feeling embarrassed despite recognizing that the condition was not their fault.
Several reasons for staying silent came to mind: it was late, the friend had said she was tired, and she did not share every illness she experienced. The author later recognized that the first two reasons sounded considerate but did not explain the continued silence the next morning. The third, the author wrote, amounted to keeping score.
The decision was interrupted when the author’s young daughter woke from a nightmare. The next morning, routine took over, and the author did not return to the conversation. In the essay, the author says the deliberation was interrupted, not resolved, and reports still not having told the friend. Whether that will change is left open.
Privacy Versus Automatic Avoidance
The essay’s distinction matters because not disclosing personal information is not automatically avoidance. A person may reasonably decide that a particular friend, setting or moment is not right for a sensitive conversation. The author says the concern about others discussing the health issue without them, or reducing them to a label, felt different from the excuses about timing.
At the same time, the account shows how a conversation can fade without a clear choice. For readers, its practical point is not that vulnerability requires disclosure, but that noticing the reasons for silence can help clarify whether they reflect a boundary or a decision that has not actually been made.
Products Worth Considering
Oral-B iO Series 9 Limited Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 7 Cleaning Modes
Hyperice Normatec Elite Wireless Compression Boots
BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells (Pair)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Late-Night Conversation Stalls
The essay is a personal account, not a reported study or clinical finding. Its author identifies as a psychologist and describes recognizing the avoidance while it was happening, but says that awareness did not make the choice easier. The piece presents that experience as an individual reflection rather than evidence about how people generally behave.
A quotation placed at the start of the essay reads, “Vulnerability minus boundaries is not vulnerability.” It is attributed there to Brené Brown. The line frames the author’s central tension: being open can matter, but openness does not mean giving every person access to private information.
“Vulnerability minus boundaries is not vulnerability.”
— Brené Brown, as quoted at the start of the Tiny Buddha essay
Whether the Friend Will Be Told
The essay does not identify the author or the friend, specify the health condition, or give a publication date. It also does not say whether the author eventually disclosed the issue. The author writes that they still had not told the friend and that they might never do so, while acknowledging that the choice could be reasonable.
The piece offers no independent reporting or clinical evidence to establish how common the described pattern is. Its observations about excuses, boundaries and avoidance should be read as the author’s own reflection.
No Further Conversation Is Confirmed
The source describes no planned follow-up or next step. The author’s account ends with the decision unresolved: the friend had not been told, and the author remained concerned about losing control over how others might discuss the health issue. The immediate question is whether the author will later choose to share it; the essay does not answer that.
Key Questions
What is the essay about?
It recounts an author’s hesitation to tell an old friend about a chronic health issue and reflects on how excuses can obscure an undecided choice.
Did the author tell the friend?
No disclosure is reported. The author says they still had not told the friend and might never do so.
Does the essay say people should disclose private information?
No. The author explicitly says that choosing not to share is a valid right and distinguishes that choice from drifting into silence without deciding.
The author’s young daughter woke from a bad dream, shifting the author’s attention to comforting her. The author later described the decision as interrupted rather than resolved.
Source: tinybuddha.com
